Since its founding, The United States has relied on the Constitution to safeguard expansive liberties for the citizens of the nation. The Founders who produced that governing document had many different views on life, but they all shared a common belief in individual sovereignty that guided them to create a charter that placed strict checks on the power of government. In modern times, a movement toward anti constitutionalism now poses a serious threat to that established order.
Those who oppose our intended system of governance have gone to great lengths to infiltrate areas of society that provide them a means for spreading their beliefs. They occupy positions of authority within the educational system, as well as in the mass media. They have been so effective in this strategy that most universities, newspapers, and broadcast media stations now employ people who are intimately involved in the spreading of this worldview.
At its core, this movement's philosophy represents a return to the past as it existed prior to our own Revolution. For most of mankind's history, the rights of the people were deemed little more than gifts from whatever tyrannical regime happened to rule over them at the time. The American Founders, taking their cue from the philosophies of various contemporary free thinkers, held to a different belief.
That concept argued that man's rights were his by nature of humanity, and were thus a gift from his Creator. As such, those liberties predate government and are thus something over which government must not have control. This concept values individual sovereignty by limiting those things that government can rightly affect.
That was the purpose of the Constitution, after all: to establish competing branches of government with separated powers, and then restrict those powers to certain limited areas of authority that would not conflict with individual sovereignty. Those rights were further strengthened by the passage of the first ten Amendments to that document.
Modern opponents of those restrictions on governmental authority, like the Progressives and various socialist groups, have a very different view of human liberty. This view is presented as a new concept, but is actually as old as humanity itself. From Babylon and The Roman Empire to modern tyrannies such as North Korea and the Soviet Union, there have always been authoritarians telling us that the collective interest trumps individual sovereignty.
Those who favor collectivism know that they Constitution is the strongest obstacle they face. As a result, generations of these opponents of Constitutional governance have worked to weaken that document's restrictions on government, while attacking individualism at every turn. They now believe themselves to be within striking distance of their final goal.
The fact is that the Constitution is in a weakened state, and the central government now has far more power than the Founders intended. Meanwhile, the opponents of our intended system of government continue to persevere in their efforts to replace individual liberty with collectivism. If they succeed, Americans in the future will rightly blame this present generation for allowing the enemies of freedom to win.
Those who oppose our intended system of governance have gone to great lengths to infiltrate areas of society that provide them a means for spreading their beliefs. They occupy positions of authority within the educational system, as well as in the mass media. They have been so effective in this strategy that most universities, newspapers, and broadcast media stations now employ people who are intimately involved in the spreading of this worldview.
At its core, this movement's philosophy represents a return to the past as it existed prior to our own Revolution. For most of mankind's history, the rights of the people were deemed little more than gifts from whatever tyrannical regime happened to rule over them at the time. The American Founders, taking their cue from the philosophies of various contemporary free thinkers, held to a different belief.
That concept argued that man's rights were his by nature of humanity, and were thus a gift from his Creator. As such, those liberties predate government and are thus something over which government must not have control. This concept values individual sovereignty by limiting those things that government can rightly affect.
That was the purpose of the Constitution, after all: to establish competing branches of government with separated powers, and then restrict those powers to certain limited areas of authority that would not conflict with individual sovereignty. Those rights were further strengthened by the passage of the first ten Amendments to that document.
Modern opponents of those restrictions on governmental authority, like the Progressives and various socialist groups, have a very different view of human liberty. This view is presented as a new concept, but is actually as old as humanity itself. From Babylon and The Roman Empire to modern tyrannies such as North Korea and the Soviet Union, there have always been authoritarians telling us that the collective interest trumps individual sovereignty.
Those who favor collectivism know that they Constitution is the strongest obstacle they face. As a result, generations of these opponents of Constitutional governance have worked to weaken that document's restrictions on government, while attacking individualism at every turn. They now believe themselves to be within striking distance of their final goal.
The fact is that the Constitution is in a weakened state, and the central government now has far more power than the Founders intended. Meanwhile, the opponents of our intended system of government continue to persevere in their efforts to replace individual liberty with collectivism. If they succeed, Americans in the future will rightly blame this present generation for allowing the enemies of freedom to win.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about anti constitutionalism, you can pay a visit to the web pages online here today. Details are available at http://blog.hogwashington.com now.
No comments:
Post a Comment