The development of living things and the universe at large has been a center of conflict between religious people and scientists. Christians believe that God created everything in a six day period as denoted in Genesis within the bible. Scientists believe evolution took place. In this perspective, several arguments against evolution theories have been advanced to reject the general scientific view.
Living things come about after procreation between those of the opposite sexes. This is the basic beginning of life in the view of both biology and religion. Scientists believe that life began from matters of non living things which are highly contradictory. With no proof but just claims by word of mouth, it is not logical for non living matter to evolve into living things.
Concerning the universe, there is no proof to show that it came into existence on its own. Neither could it have already been in existence before being formed. In the bible, God transformed it from the formless form into the way it is of now. Scientists perceive that it came into existence with a combination of gravitational forces which is not viable proof.
Such a view does not beat logic. For anything to be formed there has to be an outside intelligence to put everything in the best position as of today. Gravitational force is just a mere theory whose proof is not concrete to make it possible in formation of spherical planets and stars. Besides, if its existence has been since time in memorial, it should have diminished to lower levels as of today.
Changes occur from well organized matter to more deformed ones. These theories on the other hand state that the earth came about in the other way, matter being piled from disorganized manner to more organized ones. Such a scenario can only occur where there is intellect capacity to cause such organized formations. Without it, the others are mere speculations with no basis.
The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.
Others have their basis on cell division within the bodies of living things. This process is too slow. In addition to this, the new cell is simply a replica of the original matter. This beats logic of this theory where rampant division of cells could have brought about human beings.
With all these arguments against evolution in place, everything points to existence of scholarly person with the ability to have put everything in place; that is God. This proves that the creation story as denoted in the bible is a reality.
Living things come about after procreation between those of the opposite sexes. This is the basic beginning of life in the view of both biology and religion. Scientists believe that life began from matters of non living things which are highly contradictory. With no proof but just claims by word of mouth, it is not logical for non living matter to evolve into living things.
Concerning the universe, there is no proof to show that it came into existence on its own. Neither could it have already been in existence before being formed. In the bible, God transformed it from the formless form into the way it is of now. Scientists perceive that it came into existence with a combination of gravitational forces which is not viable proof.
Such a view does not beat logic. For anything to be formed there has to be an outside intelligence to put everything in the best position as of today. Gravitational force is just a mere theory whose proof is not concrete to make it possible in formation of spherical planets and stars. Besides, if its existence has been since time in memorial, it should have diminished to lower levels as of today.
Changes occur from well organized matter to more deformed ones. These theories on the other hand state that the earth came about in the other way, matter being piled from disorganized manner to more organized ones. Such a scenario can only occur where there is intellect capacity to cause such organized formations. Without it, the others are mere speculations with no basis.
The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.
Others have their basis on cell division within the bodies of living things. This process is too slow. In addition to this, the new cell is simply a replica of the original matter. This beats logic of this theory where rampant division of cells could have brought about human beings.
With all these arguments against evolution in place, everything points to existence of scholarly person with the ability to have put everything in place; that is God. This proves that the creation story as denoted in the bible is a reality.
About the Author:
Read more about Probable Arguments Against Evolution Theories visiting our website.
No comments:
Post a Comment