The two main parties in the US that are popularly recognized are the republican and the democratic parties. The two parties have followers who believe in the main terms the party sets. During the elections, the two parties both support their candidate to vie for the presidential seat. Campaigns are carried out to try and win the seat. They have representative in all states. Constitutional republic vs democracy helps us determine which party is better.
Citizens in a democratic country enjoy political education from the government. They learn how the government operates in its daily activities. This form of government safeguards the interest of the citizens in a country, as they are involved in selecting their leaders. The government is keen on the principal of equality as all citizens are equal before the law.
Countries with democracy form of ruling are reported to have an increase in the margin due to the improved economy. The affairs of such a state are stable as the leaders negotiate and compromise with the citizens in case of a conflict. This leads to peace in the general nation.
However, countries that apply this form of government have challenges that make it hard to function properly. Democratic method of ruling is a quantitative method. It only emphasizes on numerical figures of majority in the country. Citizens are after quality and productive leaders who will help them to develop their economy. The method uses the rule of unskilled and incompetent leaders.
Citizens in a republican enjoy fair running of government, as the citizens are the ones who empower their leaders. There is a common welfare in running of activities as the leaders and the citizens have the same goals and objectives. There is also prosperity in economy as leaders who understand what the citizens go through represent them in a government. The leaders understand the hustles these citizens go through, as they are familiar with all the activities involved.
Under the republican method, the leaders are accountable for their actions. This means if the commit any wrong in office, they will be charged under the country law. The lawmakers carefully review each law before making it the law of land. This strictness ensures all citizens have equal rights even those who hold public office. The laws are made separate for each arm of government. This makes it to hold each member in any arm of government accountable.
On the contrary, the republican method of ruling is faced by several challenges. The powerful unelected members of trade unions and members of other associations may influence a government. This leads to compromised decisions and passing of unfair laws. Opposition officials can influence the running of government by inciting the public to deny a law. Changing of any act of constitution is very difficult, as you have to consult the experts.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
Citizens in a democratic country enjoy political education from the government. They learn how the government operates in its daily activities. This form of government safeguards the interest of the citizens in a country, as they are involved in selecting their leaders. The government is keen on the principal of equality as all citizens are equal before the law.
Countries with democracy form of ruling are reported to have an increase in the margin due to the improved economy. The affairs of such a state are stable as the leaders negotiate and compromise with the citizens in case of a conflict. This leads to peace in the general nation.
However, countries that apply this form of government have challenges that make it hard to function properly. Democratic method of ruling is a quantitative method. It only emphasizes on numerical figures of majority in the country. Citizens are after quality and productive leaders who will help them to develop their economy. The method uses the rule of unskilled and incompetent leaders.
Citizens in a republican enjoy fair running of government, as the citizens are the ones who empower their leaders. There is a common welfare in running of activities as the leaders and the citizens have the same goals and objectives. There is also prosperity in economy as leaders who understand what the citizens go through represent them in a government. The leaders understand the hustles these citizens go through, as they are familiar with all the activities involved.
Under the republican method, the leaders are accountable for their actions. This means if the commit any wrong in office, they will be charged under the country law. The lawmakers carefully review each law before making it the law of land. This strictness ensures all citizens have equal rights even those who hold public office. The laws are made separate for each arm of government. This makes it to hold each member in any arm of government accountable.
On the contrary, the republican method of ruling is faced by several challenges. The powerful unelected members of trade unions and members of other associations may influence a government. This leads to compromised decisions and passing of unfair laws. Opposition officials can influence the running of government by inciting the public to deny a law. Changing of any act of constitution is very difficult, as you have to consult the experts.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
About the Author:
You can visit www.myamericamyhome.net for more helpful information about Info On The Constitutional Republic Vs Democracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment