It is usual to establish gradations between electors and elected, for example, the US President is elected by the electoral college, and the Westminster system, the Prime Minister is formally appointed by the "head of state" (where actually chosen by the parliament or by his own party). Generally direct elections and those with degrees have similar second election results (Illinois elections 2014).
However, in some cases electoral systems allow election of candidates who receive the highest number of popular votes; a recent example being the American election of 2000 where he was elected President George W. Bush. A phenomenon much discussed today is the relevance of immediate presidential reelection, with supporters and opponents at all levels.
A mechanism that alters the handling equality is concerned about the size and distribution of electoral boundaries (gerrymandering, rotten boroughs). If popular sovereignty is recognized, all the people have the right both to vote (when everyone can vote, talk of universal suffrage, if not restricted suffrage) and to stand for election (all have to be elected). Sometimes the law provides for circumstances in which the right to vote or requirements of different nature for its exercise is lost; limitations which in some cases can become so abusive that distort the results electoral.
Characteristics election in each country are regulated by the electoral law, which defines its unique electoral system, such as the nature of direct election (the all citizens directly elect their vote to elect) or indirect charge (no intermediate body, composed of representatives elected by all citizens, which is the decision-maker). The introduction of innovations in electoral systems is called electoral reform.
In the cities of antiquity, election is originally a concept and a practice aristocratic; the selection of members of people for the exercise of judicial office ("Commander") is normally done by lottery, not by vote or election. Thus, at the time the aristocratic Athenian king "chosen large families." In the democratic era, the rulers forming the equivalent of executive of our governments and members of (People's Court) are drawn.
The second major step in electoral process is the registration of candidates. This step is usually regulated by an electoral law, which sets mandatory to become candidates, election period, etc. Funding of political parties is the funding provided by the State or the electorate to support election campaign of political parties. It can help to candidates and political parties on an equal footing. Its use is often subject to the rules of public accounting and each candidate or political party must justify use.
With the challenge of monarchical legitimacy and particularly that of absolute monarchy, the Enlightenment and the rise of liberalism in its many forms (philosophical, political, economic etc.) leads to reintroduce and reworking the concept of election . These movements of ideas give rise to practices that now form the basis of our democratic institutions.
Thus, national sovereignty is thought of as not being able to be exercised directly or through freely chosen representatives, so elected. Thus, unless a direct democracy, the exercise of democracy is confused with that of representative democracy. Whenever the choices available to a group of people reflect a plurality -except to admit precedence under the doctrinaire or the law of Fort the need to decide between several different options or different raises the question of how decision.
However, in some cases electoral systems allow election of candidates who receive the highest number of popular votes; a recent example being the American election of 2000 where he was elected President George W. Bush. A phenomenon much discussed today is the relevance of immediate presidential reelection, with supporters and opponents at all levels.
A mechanism that alters the handling equality is concerned about the size and distribution of electoral boundaries (gerrymandering, rotten boroughs). If popular sovereignty is recognized, all the people have the right both to vote (when everyone can vote, talk of universal suffrage, if not restricted suffrage) and to stand for election (all have to be elected). Sometimes the law provides for circumstances in which the right to vote or requirements of different nature for its exercise is lost; limitations which in some cases can become so abusive that distort the results electoral.
Characteristics election in each country are regulated by the electoral law, which defines its unique electoral system, such as the nature of direct election (the all citizens directly elect their vote to elect) or indirect charge (no intermediate body, composed of representatives elected by all citizens, which is the decision-maker). The introduction of innovations in electoral systems is called electoral reform.
In the cities of antiquity, election is originally a concept and a practice aristocratic; the selection of members of people for the exercise of judicial office ("Commander") is normally done by lottery, not by vote or election. Thus, at the time the aristocratic Athenian king "chosen large families." In the democratic era, the rulers forming the equivalent of executive of our governments and members of (People's Court) are drawn.
The second major step in electoral process is the registration of candidates. This step is usually regulated by an electoral law, which sets mandatory to become candidates, election period, etc. Funding of political parties is the funding provided by the State or the electorate to support election campaign of political parties. It can help to candidates and political parties on an equal footing. Its use is often subject to the rules of public accounting and each candidate or political party must justify use.
With the challenge of monarchical legitimacy and particularly that of absolute monarchy, the Enlightenment and the rise of liberalism in its many forms (philosophical, political, economic etc.) leads to reintroduce and reworking the concept of election . These movements of ideas give rise to practices that now form the basis of our democratic institutions.
Thus, national sovereignty is thought of as not being able to be exercised directly or through freely chosen representatives, so elected. Thus, unless a direct democracy, the exercise of democracy is confused with that of representative democracy. Whenever the choices available to a group of people reflect a plurality -except to admit precedence under the doctrinaire or the law of Fort the need to decide between several different options or different raises the question of how decision.
About the Author:
If you plan to vote in the Illinois elections 2014 check out Brannigan for Congress. See the difference that Sharon Brannigan will make, when you visit us online today at http://www.branniganforcongress.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment