A lot of Christians today are conflicted about the tithing issue. For the most part believers want to know that their actions in tithing or refusing to do so are in accordance with what God wants. For guidance on how to live the lives that please God, many look at the examples set by patriarchs like Abraham. A deep examination of the life he lived will prove that Abraham did not tithe.
The misconception that Abraham paid tithes is rooted in an incident that takes place in the book of Genesis chapter fourteen. The incident entails a battle in which Abraham engaged after lot, his nephew was captured and taken away among the people of Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot's captors were identified as the four kings.
The four Kings had taken more than Lot though. They had also taken other captives and the possessions of the people who were living in Sodom and Gomorrah. This means that Lot's possessions were also taken away since he was living among the people of Sodom and Gomorrah.
The patriarch defeated the four kings. He had help in doing this though. Fighting alongside him were other men such as the three hundred and eighteen men from his household and his allies mentioned in chapter thirteen, Aner, Mamre and Eshcol. The Lord was with him in battle also, and this was the main reason for his victory. He did however, also have the help of other men.
The customs in those days was to divide the spoils of war after victory and it is in this context that Abraham's issuing of one tenth of the plunder to Melchizedek should be seen. It is impossible to argue that Melchizedek was there but was not in the battle. The fact that Melchidezek also happened to be a priest of God does not in itself make the act one of tithing. An even if he was not with the patriarch during battle, the act still does not qualify as tithing as it more resembles the customs of bestowing a gift after or before a blessing as is seen with Isaac and his sons. Later on the patriarch asks that the other allies be given their share of the spoils.
There is also the fact that tithes are calculated as a percentage of the giver's possessions. The spoils accessed by Abraham would hardly qualify as all his possessions. The patriarch refuses to acknowledge them as his and rejects the King of Sodom's offer for him to take over the spoils explaining that he has taken an oath to God promising not to take anything.
In addition to not being his and simply being the spoils of war being divided, the patriarch's action fails to fulfill another requirement of tithing. Tithing is a habitual act but this was an isolated event. It was not repeated.
This patriarch's actions in Genesis fourteen cannot be used as strong evidence in favor of tithing. He was not following a requirement to give a portion of his earnings or properties to the Lord. He was simply ensuring that those who fought a hard battle and won received their just rewards.
The misconception that Abraham paid tithes is rooted in an incident that takes place in the book of Genesis chapter fourteen. The incident entails a battle in which Abraham engaged after lot, his nephew was captured and taken away among the people of Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot's captors were identified as the four kings.
The four Kings had taken more than Lot though. They had also taken other captives and the possessions of the people who were living in Sodom and Gomorrah. This means that Lot's possessions were also taken away since he was living among the people of Sodom and Gomorrah.
The patriarch defeated the four kings. He had help in doing this though. Fighting alongside him were other men such as the three hundred and eighteen men from his household and his allies mentioned in chapter thirteen, Aner, Mamre and Eshcol. The Lord was with him in battle also, and this was the main reason for his victory. He did however, also have the help of other men.
The customs in those days was to divide the spoils of war after victory and it is in this context that Abraham's issuing of one tenth of the plunder to Melchizedek should be seen. It is impossible to argue that Melchizedek was there but was not in the battle. The fact that Melchidezek also happened to be a priest of God does not in itself make the act one of tithing. An even if he was not with the patriarch during battle, the act still does not qualify as tithing as it more resembles the customs of bestowing a gift after or before a blessing as is seen with Isaac and his sons. Later on the patriarch asks that the other allies be given their share of the spoils.
There is also the fact that tithes are calculated as a percentage of the giver's possessions. The spoils accessed by Abraham would hardly qualify as all his possessions. The patriarch refuses to acknowledge them as his and rejects the King of Sodom's offer for him to take over the spoils explaining that he has taken an oath to God promising not to take anything.
In addition to not being his and simply being the spoils of war being divided, the patriarch's action fails to fulfill another requirement of tithing. Tithing is a habitual act but this was an isolated event. It was not repeated.
This patriarch's actions in Genesis fourteen cannot be used as strong evidence in favor of tithing. He was not following a requirement to give a portion of his earnings or properties to the Lord. He was simply ensuring that those who fought a hard battle and won received their just rewards.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about whether Abraham did not tithe, you can pay a visit to the web pages online here today. Details are available at http://www.abraham-did-not-tithe.com now.
No comments:
Post a Comment